CVS update: samba/source/libsmb

Jeremy Allison jra at
Thu Jul 31 17:04:01 GMT 2003

On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:55:24PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

> The original idea was that we would 'enable' signing on the connection -
> by setting the function pointers etc, but that we would only set
> 'doing_signing' when our partner correctly signed a response.  In
> particular, the idea was to ensure that on a login failure, we would
> correctly back down, and not enforce signing on subsequent packets. 
> Likewise, we need to cope with a server that has an invalid session
> key.  This would occour if the PDC it is attached to is Samba 2.2.
> Does this make sense?

Yes thanks - I'm happy with the variables now - I even think I understand
the design now (which was very good btw :-) :-).


More information about the samba-technical mailing list