tagged the head branch

[Simo Sorce]

On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 13:54, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:07:31PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > I would rather modify this test to see actual brokeness of glibc <=2.3
> > because vendors might definitely patch their versions with this simple
> > patch from glibc:
> 
> Yes, but this is rather difficult to test. The only way I can see is with a
> user in nsswitch that can safely be assumed to have at least one supplementary
> group from /etc/group.
> 
> Volker

what about a bit of awk on /etc/group?
find out a group with multiple users in it and then do the test with
them?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030716/823b5058/attachment.bin