refactoring idmap code in smbd
simo.sorce at xsec.it
Wed Jul 9 17:34:38 GMT 2003
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 19:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > IMHO this is *not* the right way to do that.
> You are incorrect. You had your chance to code your design
> and it didn't work. The new design mainly consists of
> removing code from smbd. This is a clear sign that we have it right.
no my bad is that I had no time to finish my work, and I should never
put it in.
The design is clear, but will block further development imho.
> > The winbindd_passdb, thing was the right way to do so, but I'll shut up
> > now.
> Explain why winbindd needs to store 'logon hours' etc. information.
> How is this useful to POSIX callers ? How would they get to it ?
who said it will need logon hours?
It was meant to unify completely user management and avoid information
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030709/c113a4e9/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical