Wrong usage of lp_idmap_backend() value?

[Simo Sorce]

On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 10:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

> The problem is that we want to run idmap_ldap without pdb_ldap (for
> winbind distributed IDMAP).
> 
> But yes - we need a way to make this foolproof.

if you do not use ldap for users, it is really silly that you are forced
to use it for idamp.

I do not think any will want top use idmap_ldap if not yet using
pdb_ldap.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030703/63f7e241/attachment.bin