Will these patches make it into 2.2.8?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 jra at dp.samba.org wrote:

> > as 2.2.8 seems to approach now, have the following patches been
> > considered for it?  They both don't add functionality, but rather
> > improve robustness, and are platform independent:
> > 
> >    http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-December/041413.html
> > 
> > prevents winbindd from damaging its own idmap TDB on write failures
> > (filesystem full), by rolling back partial changes done by the failed
> > store of mapping.
> > 
> >    http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2003-January/041897.html
> > 
> > avoids the reconnect delay when DC pipes have died, thus avoids
> > false negatives to be returned to clients, and to be cached.
> > 
> > Not a 100%, however. If there is really no DC available at the time
> > of query, it will still happen. But it's an improvement compared
> > to having these false negatives always after a connection died.
> 
> They are in my inbox queue of things to merge. I have to work on HP
> printing bugs as my 'day' job priority, but I have not forgotten
> these and will ensure they get added before 2.2.8

But probably not for 2.2.8pre1.


cheers, jerry
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hewlett-Packard            ------------------------- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team                 ---------------------- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key                  ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
                            --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+OrpVIR7qMdg1EfYRAu+GAKCpW4P4Pibv8skvszyDYUBLJP8PqgCaA19Y
Bypeyi93rn82wacRuxGFzzs=
=EKGi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----