Proposal for extending 'netbios aliases' to 'netbios virtual
hosts' for nmbd
Kashif Shaikh
kshaikh at consensys.com
Thu Jan 30 17:02:59 GMT 2003
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Kashif Shaikh wrote:
>
>
>>In my case, I get multiple IPs on a subnet through virtual IPs. So in
>>Linux I have eth0, eth0:1, eth0:2. Let's attach some numbers to them
>>for illustration: eth0 = 192.168.2.1, eth0:1 192.168.2.101, and eth0:2
>>192.168.2.102. Now if such a configuration exists, nmbd when operating
>>as a B-node, will only register names and aliases on eth0, not on the
>>eth0:1 or eth0:2 virtual interfaces.
>
> This can be done now actually by running multiple Samba instances.
> I'm guessing your already knew this, but just in case....
>
>>What I propose is changing netbios aliases to simple netbios virtual
>>hosts, where I can specify netbios name/IP mappings. So a sample
>>configuration item would be:
>>
>>interfaces = 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0
>>virtual netbios hosts = SALES/192.168.2.101 DEVELOPMENT/192.168.2.101
>
>
> Sounds interesting, but this is only for name registration right?
> Effectively you could just run one smbd using netbios aliases
> and then run a separate nmbd instance per name (bound to a specific NIC)
> and get the exact behavior you are asking for.
Well honestly, I had incorrectly assumed network port space was global,
when in fact it is private for each IP address(which is why I didn't
bother to running multiple instances). Also, AFAIK in the Using Samba
book(1st ed), 'interfaces' is described as network/netmask pairs.
That's inconsistent with intrepret_interfaces() comment, but then again
the book is over 2 years old:)
So thanks, I can now run multiple s/nmbds per IP address which gives the
behavior I was looking for with virtual hosts ;)
Regards,
Kashif
>
> cheers, jerry
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list