problem with oplocks.

Christopher R. Hertel crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Mon Feb 17 21:02:59 GMT 2003


On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:53:14PM +0100, Olaf Fr?czyk wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:42, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > I use samba with linux 7.2 kernel 4.7, samba 2.2.1a
> 
> > Is there any solution to avoid these errors ??
> > 
> > With redhat 6.2 and samba 2.0.2 (?) tehere were no errors.
> > 
> Hi,
> 
> I had the same problems. Upgrade your samba to 2.2.7a and it will work
> OK.
> It was fixed about 2.2.6 AFAIK.
> BTW, oplocks are unreliable by definition, so I don't use them.
> The small speed improvement (if any) is not worth loosing data integrity
> from my point of view.

Um... Just curious, but how are "oplocks are unreliable by definition"?

Chris -)-----

-- 
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/     -)-----   Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/   -)-----   ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/     -)-----   crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/    -)-----   crh at ubiqx.org


More information about the samba-technical mailing list