winbindd losing trust relationship once in a while (Samba 3.0)

[Ken Cross]

The patch works on SAMBA_3_0 as of 5 minutes ago.  How did you patch it
manually?

The messages you see below are normal and don't indicate any real
problems.

Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: samba-technical-bounces+kcross=nssolutions.com at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-technical-bounces+kcross=nssolutions.com at lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Nir Soffer
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Tim Potter; samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: winbindd losing trust relationship once in a while (Samba
3.0)


[snip]
> 
> I wonder whether the trusted domains patch that went by today
> fixes this
> as well?  Would you mind trying it?

Since the patch doesn't apply to a20, and I couldn't be bothered to
check why properly - I downloaded the CVS version, for the hell of it.
The patch didn't apply to that either, so I did it manually.

Both before and after the patch, not only did the trusted domains not
work, but I couldn't do a wbinfo -u that worked.

This snippet probably explains why:

[2003/02/12 15:14:42, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(414)
  client_read: read 1312 bytes. Need 0 more for a full request.
[2003/02/12 15:14:42, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_request(297)
  process_request: request fn LIST_USERS
[2003/02/12 15:14:42, 3]
nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_list_users(533)
  [21233]: list users
[2003/02/12 15:14:42, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:client_write(460)
  client_write: wrote 1300 bytes.
[2003/02/12 15:14:42, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(414)
  client_read: read 0 bytes. Need 1312 more for a full request.
[2003/02/12 15:14:42, 5] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(419)
  read failed on sock 12, pid 21233: EOF


So, sorry, but that doesn't seem to work.

Alpha 20 was the last version that actually worked for me...




-- 
Nir Soffer -=- Software Engineer, Exanet Inc. -=-
"The poor little kittens; They lost their mittens;
 And now you all must die. Mew, Mew, Mew, Mew, 
 And now you all must die." www.sluggy.com, 24/10/02>