Status of docs merge to 3.0

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 1 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

> I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them
> to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sure what the status is, given we seem to
> have a slightly different syntax in HEAD (XML compliant?)
> 
> So, should I just merge my text changes, or wait for the lot to be
> merged or?

Jelmer?

I think it is probably ok to wait on the docs since HEAD is truth
here.  The only problem will be documentation parameters that are 
in HEAD that have not (or will not) be merged to 3.0 (e.g. the client 
ntlmv2 stuff you are working on now).

Jelmer might have a different idea though.  I'll let him lead.




cheers, jerry
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hewlett-Packard            ------------------------- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team                 ---------------------- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key                  ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."  
                            --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+R9TpIR7qMdg1EfYRAgoKAKCvCLq4byMA541hipdbi46RhRAEmwCg3xPY
ohG2B2GJk3ypgemhR2U3YrU=
=oRsb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----