Solaris fcntl CPU/Lock update
pbelang1 at oss.cantel.rogers.com
Tue Feb 4 23:16:20 GMT 2003
David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering wrote:
> "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote: indirectly to you from pbelanger:
Thanx Christopher to forward the info.
>><pbelanger> Please let know jra that libnspr4.so and libnss3.so ARE linked
>> to libpthread and libthread under Solaris
> I assume libnspr4.so and libnss3.so are special libraries
> provided as part of open LDAP: the Solaris nss libraries are
> nss_compat.so.1 nss_files.so.1 nss_nis.so.1 nss_user.so.1
> nss_dns.so.1 nss_ldap.so.1 nss_nisplus.so.1 nss_xfn.so.1
> with nothing resembling libnss3, while there are no
> nspr libraries at all.
> I did a quick check, and there are no solaris libraries
> which make calls into libposix...
I would suggest to compile Samba using OpenLDAP instead of
Sun's (Netscape) LDAP libraries and see if there's still
The back-trace looks *very* weird. gdb is not "thread aware"
as far as I remember? Could it be the reason why the
back-trace is "weird"?
I'd seriously think of compiling using OpenLDAP, I'd like to
see the results. I'm even thinking of download Sun's SDK and
play around with it to see if I get the same problem here,
but I'm way too busy for the next few days.
More information about the samba-technical