"NTLMv2 Response (Only)" yields Unicode password length of 78
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Apr 10 22:55:05 GMT 2003
On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 05:24, Ken Cross wrote:
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:56 PM
> >
> > We have had LMv2 code available for a while (thanks to the
> > TNG folk) but
> > there was little impetus to push ahead with it. Few people
> > have asked.
> > You're one of the few. :)
> >
> >
> > Chris -)-----
> >
>
>
> FWIW, here's one more vote to support NT LMv2. We have a customer that
> is going to restrict all users to LMv2 only. That breaks Samba 3.0
> pretty badly.
??
I have had NTLMv2 in 3.0 for over a year, and LMv2 for months now. It's
been fully supported inside NTLMSSP for ages too.
I would be very interested to hear how it's failing.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030411/2d170cb3/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list