"NTLMv2 Response (Only)" yields Unicode password length of 78
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Apr 10 22:55:05 GMT 2003
On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 05:24, Ken Cross wrote:
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:56 PM
> > We have had LMv2 code available for a while (thanks to the
> > TNG folk) but
> > there was little impetus to push ahead with it. Few people
> > have asked.
> > You're one of the few. :)
> > Chris -)-----
> FWIW, here's one more vote to support NT LMv2. We have a customer that
> is going to restrict all users to LMv2 only. That breaks Samba 3.0
> pretty badly.
I have had NTLMv2 in 3.0 for over a year, and LMv2 for months now. It's
been fully supported inside NTLMSSP for ages too.
I would be very interested to hear how it's failing.
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030411/2d170cb3/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical