nmbd cldap patch

[Luke Howard]

Why is the GUID a secret? Can't it be a configuration file option? Really,
it should be retrieved from the directory, but I appreciate that this is
difficult with the existing SAMBA architecture.

-- Luke

>From: "Jim McDonough" <jmcd at us.ibm.com>
>Subject: Re: nmbd cldap patch
>To: Gerald Carter <jerry at samba.org>
>Cc: samba-technical at samba.org
>Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:06:48 -0400
>
>
>>> Here's a link to the patch that aliguori wrote and I cleaned up to
>respond
>>> to the connectionless ldap v3 requests for netlogon info.
>>> http://www-124.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/patches/?patch_id=540
>>
>>Can we just check it in and surround if by an #ifdef ?  Or is the code too
>>stread out?
>The problem is that it ends up including secrets.o in way too many links to
>retrieve the domain GUID.  It does need to be retrieved somewhere else,
>IMO, and I don't really want to do that to Makefile.in.  Otherwise it's not
>to bad to do it...
>
>----------------------------
>Jim McDonough
>IBM Linux Technology Center
>Samba Team
>6 Minuteman Drive
>Scarborough, ME 04074
>USA
>
>jmcd at us.ibm.com
>jmcd at samba.org
>
>Phone: (207) 885-5565
>IBM tie-line: 776-9984
>
>

--
Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com