Do we need sam/api.c?
jelmer at samba.org
Sat Sep 28 18:05:00 GMT 2002
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 12:56:29AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Do we need sam/api.c?':
> I was wondering: In the new SAM stuff do we really need the api.c?
> Why not make the api the context_ functions, and use the default context
> if the user does not specify one (ie NULL)?
> This would remove one layer from this whole area, which might make it
> easier to comprehend...
Yeah, that's a *really* good idea! Every layer less (that's not
necessary) is a good thing (TM)!
> That would make it 'user -> context -> backend', which might be easier
> for potential developers to swallow.
> It would also make samtest magicly 'work' before you specify a context,
> rather than segfaulting...
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org>
Pending (unfinished) patches http://samba.org/~jelmer/diffs.php
More information about the samba-technical