approaching release of 3.0alpha20

[Simo Sorce]

On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 15:48, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> At 23:34 25.09.2002 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, returning always NT_STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED is the way to go imho.
> >
> >This is in the old pdb code, so we don't have NTSTATUS there yet - so
> >for there I think the null pointer works.  For the new code, then
> >certainly I think the NTSTATUS return makes sense.
> 
> yep. But we always have to check for NULL pointers :-)

sorry ?

-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20020925/6faa04a7/attachment.bin