approaching release of 3.0alpha20
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Sep 25 13:22:01 GMT 2002
Simo Sorce wrote:
> This way to fix, without any DEBUG in is obscure and may hide
> implementation errors imho.
> A crash is much more easier to understand while developing.
We (ctrlsoft and I) had decided that implementing those functions was
optinal - I think we had the stub functions before, and removed them...
In any case, as long as it doesn't break, I'm not too fussed - but I
actually like the ability to say 'not implemented' in a way much clearer
than than trying to infer it from a BOOL return.
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
More information about the samba-technical