trusted domains patch n+3

[Simo Sorce]

I tested yesterday against w2k, if you passa bogis domain name it simply
ignore and try against the local sam.

Simo.

On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 12:47, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:11:05AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Ok, that was clear, what I want to ask, is: why should we try to logon a
> > user that provides bad information? Shouldn't we simply deny it with an
> > error? How do NT behaves in such situations?
> 
> In case of incorrect credentials passed when attempting to connect,
> NT prompts you to enter username and password. Just like completely
> new logon to remote server's SAM.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> cheers,
> +------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <mimir at diament.ists.pwr.wroc.pl>   |
> |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba                                  /
> |__________________________________________________________/
-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20020907/fca6f0e1/attachment.bin