trusted domains patch n+3

[Simo Sorce]

On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> One is the username they wanted, the other is the username they got
> (after the username map file).  Similarly for domains - if the domain
> they wanted is trusted, and we are not allowing trusted domains, or if
> the domain doesn't exist, then we replace it with our own domain.  
> 
> We may still need their original username/domain for authenticaion
> (NTLMv2 comes to mind in particular), hence why we keep both.

What are you trying to do there?
Why should we replace a domain name with another???

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20020906/b9800775/attachment.bin