Fixed: OpLocks caused the corruptions/slowness (Was: How Samba let us down)

jra at jra at
Mon Oct 28 23:35:01 GMT 2002

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:02:11PM -0800, Chris de Vidal wrote:

> Still, wouldn't you welcome documentation advising
> people of potential corruption?  I think we both agree
> that there is no guarantee that everyone's network is
> 100% "on" and the danger of corruption appears to be
> greater when there are large files read and written to
> a record at a time (namely, flat databases).

Well we ship by default with the same options as
Windows. Windows will ignore oplock missing oplock
break responses. At least we log a message.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list