why doesn't the kernel enforce oplocks? (was: Re: [Samba] Re:
How Samba let us down)
simo.sorce at xsec.it
Thu Oct 24 20:32:00 GMT 2002
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 20:48, Ben Johnson wrote:
> samba and vi aren't written to cooperate for example. should these be
> written to cooperate? that would mean the authors of each would have to
> cooperate. it seems like it would be easier to have the kernel force
By cooperation jra means they should use locks the right way.
And then the klernel forces cooperation.
I dunno if vi "cooperates", but samba surely can cooperate, as samba
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20021024/30320392/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical