Consistency in parameter names?
vorlon at netexpress.net
Thu Oct 24 03:49:00 GMT 2002
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:22:07PM -0700, Jay Ts wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:04:16AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > We have:
> > add user script
> > add group script
> > add machine script
> > ...
> delete user script
> logon script
> magic script
> > and
> > add share command
> > add printer command
> > ?
> I noticed it too. Ideally, (with the exception of
> logon script) I think they should all use "command" rather
> than "script", because AFAIK, they all can work with
> compiled programs as well as interpreted scripts. Samba
> doesn't care, it just execs the command with arguments, right?
> If not, I'd really like to know!
The reasoning I've heard for "delete user script" being called "script"
instead of "command" is that it's BAD to point this at something like
adduser without a certain amount of error checking... doesn't stop some
of us, though. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20021024/e0cf14c0/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical