Commit my stuff to 3.0?

Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Oct 14 07:05:03 GMT 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Yes, we need a simple solution, but I'm not sure there is one...

Seeing all these Problems I am now not sure if removing all the
dependencies on algorithmic mapping is a good idea. I'm currently
looking at the code from a different perspective: All this mess came
up for the vampire stuff. So, why not treat these RIDs as the
exception, and really go for the algorithmic mapping as the rule. I
know, I have argued very strongly against that, but it might only have
been because I did not see all the consequences. The code probably
would have to be cleaned up, but it might simplify a lot.

Volker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key-ID ADE377D8, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 3700000

iD8DBQE9qmykZeeQha3jd9gRAhsEAJ9qTOJb8hXCeLU5ETZr7ECHSXV2yACfVUbg
7jYK7Dp+NEsxeBCnX+G7Anc=
=1hTz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the samba-technical mailing list