Commit my stuff to 3.0?

Simo Sorce simo.sorce at xsec.it
Sun Oct 13 13:58:00 GMT 2002


On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 15:40, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Yep, that sounds worthwhile.  We could even just make it a timeout - and
> finally put gencache to use :-).  (mimir's generalised tdb cache).  

We do **not** need timeouts!
remember that sid->uid mapping is written in stone, once you have done
it it cannot be changed _ever_.

> > But to use ldap as a central storage you have to solve how to handle
> > foreign or builtin/special SIDs!
> 
> Well, I was only looking at mapping our own domain - I was thinking the
> rest should happend via winbind.  However, it does make more sense that
> this is all handled in one place.  I think we can deal with this.

if you want it to be fast, better it stay in one place.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20021013/70dbdf1c/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list