Commit my stuff to 3.0?

[Simo Sorce]

> > > We have many of these problems already, but they get worse when
> > > allocated RIDs are the norm, rather then the exception.  Perhaps we
> > > should move SID->uid and uid->SID stuff into a seperate module?  This
> > > was somthing we were looking at for the 'new SAM', but maybe we need it
> > > sooner.  (It is not dependent on the rest of the work).
> > 
> > I remember the word SURS.... ;-) I think this would not help. We will
> > never be perfect NT, we will always have rough edges. But at least if
> > the behaviour is known and documented, I would be happy. I need to
> > *explain* that stuff to people sitting in courses. For this simplicity
> > is really important.
> 
> Yes, we need a simple solution, but I'm not sure there is one...

Isn't idmap the right place to go?

-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20021013/e66420e1/attachment.bin