Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS
jra at samba.org
Thu May 30 14:33:01 GMT 2002
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:35:38AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:55:20PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:48:27PM -0700, abartlet at samba.org wrote:
> > >
> > > And are you saying that Win2k will never 'idle' a client connection? I'm
> > > sure I've seen smbfs being 'idled' by NT before...
> > I don't think it ever drops the TCP connection on purpose.
> I'm quite positive it does. I have seen sites with 'security = server' fail
> miserably after having changed to W2k on the DC due to disconnects from the DC.
No, I mean that the Win2k server service won't drop a client
connection on purpose if there's no traffic on it (it doesn't
More information about the samba-technical