Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Thu May 30 00:41:28 GMT 2002
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:55:20PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:48:27PM -0700, abartlet at samba.org wrote:
> > And are you saying that Win2k will never 'idle' a client connection? I'm
> > sure I've seen smbfs being 'idled' by NT before...
> I don't think it ever drops the TCP connection on purpose.
I'm quite positive it does. I have seen sites with 'security = server' fail
miserably after having changed to W2k on the DC due to disconnects from the DC.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20020530/b402a123/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical