[PATCH] store SID's in SAM_ACCOUNT

[Simo Sorce]

I agree, I was thinking the same yesterday evening.
I will have to check srv_samr_nt.c too because I have not changed it
when found sid_peek_rid, and I'm not sure the domain is check every
time.

On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 13:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> It might be worth reworking that function to take an 'expected domain
> sid' argument.  That way we can ensure that we don't make (incorrect)
> assumtions about what the sid beeing 'peeked at' represents.  I can
> imagine some subtle (and really annoying to track down) bugs being
> introduced/prevented depending on what checks we do here.

-- 
Simo Sorce
----------
Una scelta di liberta': Software Libero.
A choice of freedom: Free Software.
http://www.softwarelibero.it