OT: unix-centric vs windows
ulf.bertilsson at adcomdata.no
Tue Mar 19 06:54:10 GMT 2002
> John Malmberg wrote:
> > While the plain text hacks are not needed for current versions of
> > SAMBA, It is useful to have them available for those that
> are running
> > older versions.
> Actually they're necessary for anyone who
> wants single-signon without trying to kludge
> your Solaris/Irix/AIX/HP-UX/Linux
Amithlon (Amiga OS 3.9 with native
X86 lowlevel emulation.)
> machines to authenticate their users via a Windows PDC.
Well, the other way seems impossible so.
> In short, for any sites which are unix-centric
> rather than windows-centric.
I like to think all my os and boxes should work in the best synergy
Right now this prove to be an Win2000 AD controller.
I will tho try 2.2.X and see what's possible.
I'm a bit confused in what is under development and what finished.
> Plus, of course, for people who don't **like**
In the end of the day, there is nothing better that turn on your
It boots in a few seconds and you know every corner of it.
Working with Win2000, Cluster, San, High END AIX stuff
makes you dream to the days of simple working boxes.
> --dave (an admitted Unix/Multics bigot) c-b
So, how can samba be used as fullblown auth/Single logon server
for an large number of misc clients ? :)
Amiga nutta :)
More information about the samba-technical