Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to
samba-share
Esh, Andrew
AEsh at tricord.com
Mon Jun 24 07:47:02 GMT 2002
I looked at the captures of win98 uploading to amithlon and redhat. They are
not rabbit-pellet mode. The protocol is using full sized packets, 64K
chunks, and has between two and four packets on the wire at a time. There
are no flush commands present, which is the main characteristic of the slow
transfer mode.
Those two transfers appear to be operating rather quickly, with end-to-end
response time in the 6-10ms range, and streamed packet intervals around
30us. I measured one 64K chunk taking 260ms to be transferred, which is
close to a 2Mb/S transfer rate.
Is there something else I should look at?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ulf Bertilsson [mailto:ulf.bertilsson at adcomdata.no]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:54 AM
To: Esh, Andrew; crh at umn.edu; David.Collier-Brown at Sun.COM
Cc: samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows
to samba-share
Importance: Low
I finaly got the mashine up and running again =D
If it's still interesting here is a download point for captures..
http://www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/download/
I'm puzzeled over that I also have this error in win2k.
--
Ulf
-----Original Message-----
From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:AEsh at tricord.com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Ulf Bertilsson; crh at umn.edu; David.Collier-Brown at Sun.COM
Cc: samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows
to samba-share
Please send a copy of any tcpdumps to me as well, if you would. I spent
a lot of time characterizing the Rabbit Pellet transfer mode. I'll
recognize it right away, if that is what this is.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ulf Bertilsson [mailto:ulf.bertilsson at adcomdata.no]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:01 AM
To: crh at umn.edu; David.Collier-Brown at Sun.COM
Cc: samba-technical at samba.org
Subject: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows
to samba-share
Importance: Low
> > Just out of curiosity, what did security=server contribute:
> > added latency in some obscure part of the process???
>
> As far as we could tell... yes. ;)
>
> I really should have documented that whole episode.
I have an current "issue" with Samba 2.0.7 and an Win98 box.
Peak at ~800kb/s one way, 20-30kb/s other way (10MB enviroment)
I have some captures I will show Chris.
Could be relevant in this contex..
Otherwise, sorry for the OT :)
--
Ulf
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list