Why sambaAccount should be an auxiliary object class
Gerald Carter
jerry at samba.org
Sun Jun 2 14:42:01 GMT 2002
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Norbert Klasen wrote:
> We at DAASI suggest that "sambaAccount" is redefined (new OID, new name?)
> as an AUXILIARY object class. For Samba-only repositories, the "account"
> object class should be used as structural object class just as RFC2307
> suggests for "posixAccount".
Sounds reasonable. I'm not going to make this change in 2.2.5
though because it has a high potential of breaking installations.
Keep a watch on HEAD and we will make this update for 3.0.
cheers, jerry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com
SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org
-- http://www.plainjoe.org
"Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2
--"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list