Why sambaAccount should be an auxiliary object class

[Gerald Carter]

On Mon, 27 May 2002, Norbert Klasen wrote:

> We at DAASI suggest that "sambaAccount" is redefined (new OID, new name?) 
> as an AUXILIARY object class. For Samba-only repositories, the "account" 
> object class should be used as structural object class just as RFC2307 
> suggests for "posixAccount".

Sounds reasonable.  I'm not going to make this change in 2.2.5
though because it has a high potential of breaking installations.
Keep a watch on HEAD and we will make this update for 3.0.











cheers, jerry
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hewlett-Packard                                     http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team                                       http://www.samba.org
 --                                            http://www.plainjoe.org
 "Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed.      ISBN 0-672-32269-2
 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--