SNIA CIFS TR
Michael B.Allen
mballen at erols.com
Tue Jul 30 01:07:03 GMT 2002
Don't you think it's kind of funny that Leach and Naik aren't even
mentioned in the acknowledgements? And they put a Copyright 2001, 2002 SNIA
in there? This document is a big turd. There are major grammatical errors,
technical inaccuracies, and huge holes that aren't even mentioned (what's
the number of seconds between 1601 and 1970 again?). How about this gem on
page 1:
"Adoption of a common file sharing protocol having modern semantics
such as shared files, byte-range locking, coherent caching, change
notification, replicated storage, etc. would provide important benifits
to the Internet community."
What a load of crap! Who's going to run a CIFS server on the internet? DCE
on top of Transactions on top of SMB in front of empty 4 byte NetBIOS
headers? No thanks! Don't you think it would be worth mentioning that
SMB_COM_COPY doesn't even work? There's *nothing* about DCE/RPC in here
except for some incomprehensible banter about PDUs. The only stuff that's
accurate is the original Leach/Naik content. The few corrections I
submitted have not been fixed so why bother to contibute anything? This
document is an excuse for the different shadowy clicks to get their little
two-bit extensions in. And the funny thing is the extensions will never be
implemented by Windows servers so they're nearly pointless. I wish someone
would do a real analysis and write some practical documentation.
Sorry. Needed to be said,
Mike
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:50:26 -0500
"Christopher R. Hertel" <crh at ubiqx.mn.org> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I sent a message to your ml.com address. The SNIA CIFS TR is at:
--
A program should be written to model the concepts of the task it
performs rather than the physical world or a process because this
maximizes the potential for it to be applied to tasks that are
conceptually similar and more importantly to tasks that have not
yet been conceived.
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list