net local functionality

[Simo Sorce]

Please if even we pass functionality to net make it so it does not need
a running samba to work for local management as current utilities do.

Simo.

On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 16:18, Gerald Carter wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 mimir at diament.ists.pwr.wroc.pl wrote:
> 
> > When working on some enumeration code for net tool, I faced with
> > choice of doing some routines by "local" or "rpc" means.
> > Some of 'net' functionalities could be useful when done locally
> > instead of rpc calls only.
> > Hence I'd like to raise the question: Is it good moment to
> > start 'net local' group of subroutines or rather leave it to
> > rpc calls and move "local" functionality to other tools, like
> > e.g. pdbedit ?
> > 
> > Comments (as always) are appreciated.
> 
> Good question.  I don't know.  For linking sanity, i would
> tend to fall on the "Keep local tools out of net", but i could be 
> convinced otehrwise.....
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> cheers, jerry
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Hewlett-Packard                                     http://www.hp.com
>  SAMBA Team                                       http://www.samba.org
>  --                                            http://www.plainjoe.org
>  "Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed.      ISBN 0-672-32269-2
>  --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
> 
> 
-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20020726/d4ddc821/attachment.bin