SAMR client-side functions in Samba

[Andrew Bartlett]

mimir at diament.ists.pwr.wroc.pl wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 12:07:03PM +0200, mimir at diament.ists.pwr.wroc.pl wrote:
> > It's a bit trivial question, but anyway...
> > Is there any reason, why samr client-side functions are named
> > "do_samr_*" instead of "cli_samr_*" as the other ones
> > (e.g. cli_lsa_*) ?
> 
> ok, forget about this question . I've found that cli_samr* functions
> do exist in libsmb/cli_samr.c file. If so, another question inevitably
> follows: we do we keep such a dual implementation ? From what Source
> Navigator says, do_samr* functions aren't used at all!

OK, so you have found the hidden booty of RPC client code in rpc_client.

That is the 'old code' currently only being kept for historical
purposes, and isn't even built.  Functions from that code should be
moved into libsmb as time/resources permit - with a bit of a polish
along the way (move to NTSTATUS, make less hackish).

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net