include file configuration
claudiamoroder at st-ulrich.suedtirol.net
Tue Jan 22 11:06:09 GMT 2002
I know that the speed advantage would be near zero ( in german nul komma
nichts, zero dot nothing ) but I think it would be the cleaner way. Why
include things you don't need.
Von: "Martin Pool" <mbp at samba.org>
An: "andreas moroder" <claudiamoroder at st-ulrich.suedtirol.net>
Cc: <samba-technical at samba.org>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Januar 2002 03:00
Betreff: Re: include file configuration
> On 19 Jan 2002, andreas moroder <claudiamoroder at st-ulrich.suedtirol.net>
> > Hello,
> > would it be possible to change includes.h the way that #include
> > included only if --with-syslog whas choosen in the configuration.
> > Could the same be done with nsswitch/nss.h and --with-winbind?
> It looks to me like that would not damage anything. I doubt if it
> would be much faster since we pull in so many other headers, but if
> running Splint helps then perhaps we can put it in.
> The other thing that might help would be
> #ifndef _SPLINT_
> around the relevant headers. This works well for lclint, which cannot
> parse some declarations and is happier having no declaration at all.
> Would you prefer that Andreas?
More information about the samba-technical