malloc without check in libads
Greg Dickie
greg at justaguy.ca
Tue Jan 15 10:33:05 GMT 2002
But 2.2.3 will come off the end of that branch will it not?
Greg
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Esh, Andrew wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:42:10 -0600
> From: "Esh, Andrew" <AEsh at tricord.com>
> To: 'Greg Dickie' <greg at justaguy.ca>, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> Cc: andreas moroder <claudiamoroder at st-ulrich.suedtirol.net>,
> samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: malloc without check in libads
>
> Data point: The tip of SAMBA_2_2 has the fixes for the winbind memory leaks.
> No release has it yet.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Dickie [mailto:greg at justaguy.ca]
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:36 PM
> To: Jeremy Allison
> Cc: andreas moroder; samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: malloc without check in libads
>
>
>
> No pressure but I'm anxiously waiting for 2.2.3 to fix the winbind memory
> leaks. This should happen soon I guess?
>
> 2.2.3, 3.0 and then the world! errr sorry ;-)
>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:06:17 -0800
> > From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> > To: andreas moroder <claudiamoroder at st-ulrich.suedtirol.net>
> > Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> > Subject: Re: malloc without check in libads
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:28:48PM +0100, andreas moroder wrote:
> > >
> > > P.S. Jeremy, you wrote you are religious about SAFE_FREE.
> > > If I see how many free() are around, I am sure you are not as fanatic
> > > as a taliban.
> >
> > But I'm only as fanatic as a taliban in the SAMBA_2_2 branch :-).
> > I'm getting it ready for ship. I don't have time to care about
> > HEAD as well at the moment.
> >
> > HEAD's time is coming, however..... :-).
> >
> > Jeremy.
> >
> >
>
>
--
======================================
Greg Dickie
just a guy enterprises
greg at justaguy.ca
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list