malloc without check in libads

Greg Dickie greg at justaguy.ca
Tue Jan 15 10:33:05 GMT 2002


But 2.2.3 will come off the end of that branch will it not?

Greg

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Esh, Andrew wrote:

> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:42:10 -0600
> From: "Esh, Andrew" <AEsh at tricord.com>
> To: 'Greg Dickie' <greg at justaguy.ca>, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> Cc: andreas moroder <claudiamoroder at st-ulrich.suedtirol.net>,
>      samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: malloc without check in libads
> 
> Data point: The tip of SAMBA_2_2 has the fixes for the winbind memory leaks.
> No release has it yet.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Dickie [mailto:greg at justaguy.ca]
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:36 PM
> To: Jeremy Allison
> Cc: andreas moroder; samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: malloc without check in libads
> 
> 
> 
> No pressure but I'm anxiously waiting for 2.2.3 to fix the winbind memory
> leaks. This should happen soon I guess?
> 
> 2.2.3, 3.0 and then the world! errr sorry ;-)
> 
> Greg
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> 
> > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:06:17 -0800
> > From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> > To: andreas moroder <claudiamoroder at st-ulrich.suedtirol.net>
> > Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> > Subject: Re: malloc without check in libads
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:28:48PM +0100, andreas moroder wrote:
> > > 
> > > P.S. Jeremy, you wrote you are religious about SAFE_FREE.
> > > If I see  how many free() are around, I am sure you are not as fanatic 
> > > as a taliban.
> > 
> > But I'm only as fanatic as a taliban in the SAMBA_2_2 branch :-).
> > I'm getting it ready for ship. I don't have time to care about
> > HEAD as well at the moment.
> > 
> > HEAD's time is coming, however..... :-).
> > 
> > Jeremy.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
======================================
Greg Dickie
just a guy enterprises
greg at justaguy.ca






More information about the samba-technical mailing list