RedHat/SaMBa package distribution hassles.
davecb at canada.sun.com
Thu Feb 21 11:03:06 GMT 2002
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> However, If you put out a package that is supposed to be a drop in
> replacement for the Red Hat package(s), you will get fewer complains
> if it has the same structure as the Red Hat package(s).
Er, it isn't supposed to be...
This is the same problem as repackaging samba
for solaris with i's layout-standard peculiarities,
for AIX, for SGI and so on: the degree to which
volunteers are available limits both the number
of ports and the number of minor variants.
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Performance & Engineering | some people and astonish the rest.
Americas Customer Engineering, | -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849 | davecb at canada.sun.com
More information about the samba-technical