[Fwd: CVS update: samba/source/registry]

[Andrew Bartlett]

"Bradley W. Langhorst" wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 06:42, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > If you track CVS too closly you occasionally get bitten :-)
> >
> > This may interest those who used Samba HEAD CVS between 15 and 26 July
> > and can no longer use usrmgr on their domain.  This also applies to any
> > Debian 'Samba 2.999' snapshot during that window.
> >
> > Andrew Bartlett
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: CVS update: samba/source/registry
> > Date: Tue,  6 Aug 2002 03:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: abartlet at samba.org
> > To: samba-cvs at samba.org
> >
> >
> > Date: Tue Aug  6 03:10:54 2002
> > Author:       abartlet
> >
> > Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/registry
> > In directory va:/tmp/cvs-serv8452/registry
> >
> > Modified Files:
> >       reg_db.c
> > Log Message:
> > Back out idra's change (at his request) - the values in the tdb *should*
> > be
> > upper cased already.
> >
> > However, if you created your registry tdb in the very early versions of
> > jerry's
> > patch, you could find that usrmgr doesn't function.  Simply delete the
> > registry.tdb, it will be recreated on startup.
> >
> > Andrew Bartlett
> 
> i've just checked to be sure that my reg_db.c is up to date with HEAD
> (it is)
> I am still unable to see any groups in the selection page on an XP
> client or using rpcclient i get
> 
> rpcclient $> enumdomgroups
> result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
> 
> I have cleared out all the tdbs from /var
> and reset the SID and my ldap admin pw
> 
> is this what you intended to fix?

No, thats a different bug :-)

Andrew,

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net