pabloa at mbasystems.com.ar
Wed Aug 7 08:19:01 GMT 2002
Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 05:05:08PM -0300, Pablo Alcaraz wrote:
>>I put a "private dir" statement in the global section but testparm gave
>>me a 'unknown parameter encountered'. :-(
This is a problem! :-)
>Ah... it seems I was looking at the wrong source tree, and this option is
>only available in Samba 3.0 CVS. :/ So I guess you will need to
>recompile Samba with different options to get this behavior, if you're
>using Samba 2.2.x.
But I discover if I register in the domain the samba server that I set
in "netbios name" all the "netbios aliases" work right inside of the domain.
Is samba 3.0 secure to run in a production enviroment if I only use the
same things that samba 2.2.x?
I discover too if you update "included" conf files samba does not reload
automatically the new configuration. Is this a bug?
Other thing. I put several smb.conf.[servername] files included as:
include=/path/smb.conf.%L (inside of the main smb.conf)
I can not put something as
netbios name = %L
because this does not run. I do not know if the problem is the
secrets.tdb file (security = domain) or something else.
More information about the samba-technical