[Fwd: OpenLDAP Licence v.2.6]

Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
Tue Sep 18 08:22:16 GMT 2001


Good news,
thank you.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:19:09AM -0500, samba-technical at thewrittenword.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 09:54:53AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > This is what FSF think of OpenLDAP v2.6
> > It is near to be ok!
> 
> FYI, the latest OpenLDAP license, 2.7, is now compatible with the GPL.
> This applies to OpenLDAP 2.0.14.
> 
> > Simo.
> > 
> > Free Software Foundation wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:27:12PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On the fsf web site, in the icense list OpenLDAP Licence v 2.3 is marked as NOT
> > > > > compatible with GPL.
> > > > >
> > > > > The last release of OpenLDAP License is 2.6 and it is a bit different from 2.3
> > > > > Do anyone know if this new version is still incompatible with GPL or not?
> > > >
> > > > Don't know without checking.
> > > > licensing at gnu.org is the right place to ask so that the page can be updated.
> > > > (cc pointing to it).
> > > 
> > > It's better, but section 4 still needs some work:
> > > 
> > >      4. The names and trademarks of the authors and copyright holders
> > >      must not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale,
> > >      use or other dealing in this Software without specific, written
> > >      prior permission.
> > > 
> > > Compare to the modified BSD license (which is compatible):
> > > 
> > >      3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote
> > >      products derived from this software without specific prior written
> > >      permission.
> > > 
> > > I'm assuming here that OpenLDAP is not a trademark.  If it is, then I don't need
> > > the following scenario - the problem should be obvious.
> > > 
> > > Imagine that Linus Torvalds contributed code to OpenLDAP. Now you want
> > > to say "Our program uses OpenLDAP code and runs on GNU/Linux."  Since Linux is
> > > a trademark of Linus Torvalds, you can't do that.
> > > 
> > > Now, if it said "endorse or promote", that would be better, because then you
> > > could reasonanbly talk about the software, so long as you didn't say, "OpenLDAP
> > > thinks FooProduct is great!" (which would be false advertising and would be
> > > disallowed anyway).
> > > 
> > > As soon as I get a login on the webserver, I will update the license list to
> > > cover this.
> > > 
> > > If you know the OpenLDAP authors, and can convince them to change this, that
> > > would be fabulous.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > -David "Novalis" Turner,
> > > Licensing Question Volunteer,
> > > Free Software Foundation
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discussion mailing list
> > > Discussion at fsfeurope.org
> > > http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> > 
> > -- 
> > Simo Sorce
> > ----------
> > Una scelta di liberta': Software Libero.
> > A choice of freedom: Free Software.
> > http://www.softwarelibero.it
> 
> -- 
> albert chin (china at thewrittenword.com)
> 

-- 
Simo Sorce       idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org




More information about the samba-technical mailing list