Existing file deleted on disk full (or disk ful) errors

[Jeremy Allison]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 03:15:11PM -0400, Julie Holloway wrote:
> (Sorry for the poor append previously.  Too much formatting. Here is my
> append again, with the original included.  Hopefully, this will make
> more sense.)
> 
> I too have seen this problem.  Below is a summary of the packet flow
> between an NT client and the Samba 2.2.1 server compared with an NT
> client with an NT server: (The packet numbers are based on the Network
> Monitor traces that I took)
> 
> NT client to Samba 2.2.1 case:       NT client to NT server case:
> ==============================      =============================
> 
> pkt 64 -  Tmp file deleted           pkt 221 - Tmp file deleted
> 
> pkt 84 - Disk Full error             pkt 237 - Disk Full error
> 
> pkt 91 - Open on srvsvc (1)          pkt 242 - Open on srvsvc (1)
> 
> pkt 109 - Open on doc1.txt           pkt 256 - Open on doc1.txt
> 
> pkt 110-112 - Unlock
> 
> pkt 115 - NT IOCTL                   pkt 258 - NT IOCTL
> 
> pkt 116 - Fails (unsupported)        pkt 259 - Fails (invalid)
> 
> pkt 120 - Open on srvsvc (2)         pkt 266 - Open on srvsvc (2)
> 
> pkt 130 - Findfirst on \*            pkt 278 - Findfirst on \*
> 
> A bunch of Query path info's
> 
> pkt 157 - Open on doc1.txt.txt
> 
> pkt 159 - Query file info (0x109)
> 
> pkt 160 - fails (Invalid Level)
> 
> pkt 168 - Delete of doc1.txt
> 
> As you can see, all seems pretty normal in the Samba case until the
> FindFirst request. This problem occurs on the current CVS version of
> Samba (Linux).

The 110-112 Unlocks - are they oplock breaks ? This seems to be the only
difference (except the error return on 259). If so why is the file oplocked
in Samba and not on NT ? More info needed (packets prior to this I'm afraid).

Jeremy.