SMB performance much lower than FTP
nick.boyce at eds.com
Tue Nov 27 12:30:02 GMT 2001
[caution: I'm basically a lurker/luser on this list, and it's highly
possible you Samba Team folks shouldn't pay much attention to my ramblings
On 27.Nov.2001 David Collier-Brown and/or Louis Caron said :
> I have a colleague seeing a very odd behavior with copies done
> from a pc client to either a Samba or a Sun "Cascade" SMB server.
> The SMB copies are roughly ten times slower than ftp (!)
> Before we set up a testing process, can anyone
> suggest why SMB would be orders of magnitude slower
> than FTP on large transfers?
This may be completely irrelevant, but there seems to have been an issue
with the "write raw" feature for some Samba releases now, such that *some*
Unix flavours need the counter-intuitive setting "write raw = no" to achieve
See my posting to comp.protocols.smb with the subject "Samba Speed Problem
With Digital Unix Solved !" in October 2000 for my 2 cents in respect of
Digital Unix, and someone else's followup in respect of SCO Unixware.
[I apologise about the above URL - I know of no way to get a short URL from
When I set the parameter to "no" I saw an approx 8 times speed-up on PC -->
server writes; with server --> PC the problem doesn't exist (for me
anyway). I posted a few times about the problem until I found my solution -
almost nobody bit, but I saw enough other postings from people with slow
PC-to-server speed and acceptable server-to-PC speed to realise it wasn't
just me and my weirdo Digital Unix system :-)
Don't know what the score is with Sun/Solaris systems tho'.
Hope this helps.
EDS Southwest Solution Centre, Bristol, UK
More information about the samba-technical