VFS: connect to share is different with Win98 and smbclient

Rainer Link link at foo.fh-furtwangen.de
Sat Nov 24 11:00:03 GMT 2001


Leighton Brown wrote:
> 
> Why do we want to duplicate windows behaviour here when what we do is
> clearly superior?

No, we shouldn't duplicate win behaviour here, of course :-) The
question is, if Windows
can be urged to open one socket per share. Or, if not, if smbd could be
changed in that manner it forks a child for every (new) connection to a
share.

cheers, Rainer

-- 
Rainer Link  | Member of Virus Help Munich (www.vhm.haitec.de)           
link at suse.de | Member of AMaViS Development Team (amavis.org)     
rainer.w3.to | OpenAntiVirus Project (www.openantivirus.org)




More information about the samba-technical mailing list