VFS: connect to share is different with Win98 and smbclient
Rainer Link
link at foo.fh-furtwangen.de
Sat Nov 24 11:00:03 GMT 2001
Leighton Brown wrote:
>
> Why do we want to duplicate windows behaviour here when what we do is
> clearly superior?
No, we shouldn't duplicate win behaviour here, of course :-) The
question is, if Windows
can be urged to open one socket per share. Or, if not, if smbd could be
changed in that manner it forks a child for every (new) connection to a
share.
cheers, Rainer
--
Rainer Link | Member of Virus Help Munich (www.vhm.haitec.de)
link at suse.de | Member of AMaViS Development Team (amavis.org)
rainer.w3.to | OpenAntiVirus Project (www.openantivirus.org)
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list