VFS: connect to share is different with Win98 and smbclient
mbp at samba.org
Sat Nov 24 08:32:06 GMT 2001
On 22 Nov 2001, Leighton Brown <leightonbrown at excite.com> wrote:
> Why do we want to duplicate windows behaviour here when what we do is
> clearly superior?
We don't have any choice about whether the client opens one connection
or many, except when there are client-side registry hacks to change
The questions is whether Samba needs a way for very long-running
operations to go into the backgrounds and allow other operations on
that socket to continue. I don't know if it's a good idea -- I think
probably not, and at any rate virus scanning is probably too much of a
special case to justify it.
More information about the samba-technical