SWAT [was Re: Deleting parameters.]
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Mon Nov 12 13:32:03 GMT 2001
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > If sombody codes it in time for 3.0...
> > I'll provide the infrustructure, but I can't say its a priority,
> > particularly given the viable alternitive (and proven) PAM-based method.
> > In any case, I'll wait until the new kerberos code is bedded down, so
> > I have somthing to build on. We will probably loose the ablity to
> > authenticate SWAT from it, due to linking madness.
> That's fair. Hmm...hadn't considered swat.
> btw...currently I believe that all the PAM authentication details
> are hidden from SWAT. This means that smbd and swat use the same
> /etc/pam.d/samba PAM config file. Anyone else think swat should have
> it's own config file (i.e. /etc/pam.d/swat)?
Apart from the upgrade installation pain, I think its a great idea. Not
possible with the current code, but I shouldn't be too hard to add in
future. (Both Samba and SWAT call the same plaintext entry point on all
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
More information about the samba-technical