"add machine script" [was Re: Can I kill 'restrict anonymous'?]
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Sun Nov 11 22:23:07 GMT 2001
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Simple, reasonable paramaters. Allow flexablity, but don't have muliple
> paramaters that only produce the desired effect in combination. Also
> remove non-sensical paramaters. (Restrict anonymous that did no such
> thing).
What you see as flexible. I see as bloat. I'm sure that "read
only/writeable/writable" was seen as flexible to start off with.
Our smb.conf man page is ~130 pages in length. Why add another parameter
for something we can already do?
> Sorry, not my quote. My 'server role' indeed makes the situation *less*
> complex and does indeed 'dumb down' samba, in the way we want.
Still not convinced. Sorry. Besides adding the "auth order" (whic I agree
is a new feature we need), I fail to see how "server role" allows me to do
something I can't already do.
Am I being thick headed? The "server role" parameter seems like a
gratuitous change. Given your description, you have taken two boolean
parameters and replaced them with one parameter accepting a descreet
list of enums. All for what? Sorry Andrew B. I don't see any gain
here.
cheers, jerry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org
www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org
http://www.hp.com Hewlett-Packard
--"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list