Killing paramters: status

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at
Sun Nov 11 22:02:26 GMT 2001

"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Can anybody give me a good reason to run 'status = no'.
> >
> > Apart from providing a minuscule performance gain and breaking plenty of
> > things (yes, I think status = no is probably buggy), is there a reason
> > for this parameter not to die (i.e. always status = yes)?
> Please poll samba at to see if anyone bites.  If someone
> if using (even incorrectly), it will help us to guage
> the impact of removing it.

When I went to remove it from the code, I found I had already done it
months ago...


I'll send a message on all these changes, when I'm finished this

Its still there in 2.2

Andrew Bartlett
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at

More information about the samba-technical mailing list