Killing paramters: status
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Sun Nov 11 22:02:26 GMT 2001
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > Can anybody give me a good reason to run 'status = no'.
> >
> > Apart from providing a minuscule performance gain and breaking plenty of
> > things (yes, I think status = no is probably buggy), is there a reason
> > for this parameter not to die (i.e. always status = yes)?
>
> Please poll samba at samba.org to see if anyone bites. If someone
> if using (even incorrectly), it will help us to guage
> the impact of removing it.
When I went to remove it from the code, I found I had already done it
months ago...
:-)
I'll send a message on all these changes, when I'm finished this
'discussion'
Its still there in 2.2
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list