Killing paramters: status
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Sun Nov 11 22:02:26 GMT 2001
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Can anybody give me a good reason to run 'status = no'.
> > Apart from providing a minuscule performance gain and breaking plenty of
> > things (yes, I think status = no is probably buggy), is there a reason
> > for this parameter not to die (i.e. always status = yes)?
> Please poll samba at samba.org to see if anyone bites. If someone
> if using (even incorrectly), it will help us to guage
> the impact of removing it.
When I went to remove it from the code, I found I had already done it
I'll send a message on all these changes, when I'm finished this
Its still there in 2.2
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
More information about the samba-technical