"add machine script" [was Re: Can I kill 'restrict anonymous'?]
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Sun Nov 11 21:58:02 GMT 2001
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
> Andrew B.,
> Since your on a "path of destruction" for the smb.conf we all know
> and love, I propose killing the "add machine script". After all,
> it is redundant :)
Simple, reasonable paramaters. Allow flexablity, but don't have muliple
paramaters that only produce the desired effect in combination. Also
remove non-sensical paramaters. (Restrict anonymous that did no such
> I mean if we don't want to "dumb down" samba, then the admin
> should be able to have a single "add user script", right?
> [ i know that was a quote I can attribute to you, but hey..
> it was a chance to bring the parameter back up for a vote :) ]
Sorry, not my quote. My 'server role' indeed makes the situation *less*
complex and does indeed 'dumb down' samba, in the way we want.
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
More information about the samba-technical