an idea - psexec for UNIX systems
Paul Jansen
vlaero at yahoo.com.au
Fri Nov 9 16:26:02 GMT 2001
Hi Richard.
Conceptually the idea is no different from
rsh/rexec/ssh. In fact I bleive the various resource
kits for windows have rsh/rexec services. The beauty
of psexec is that you don't have any dependecies that
need to be installed on the remote (windows) machine.
Say for example I am at a UNIX session and I ned to
get a 'command prompt' session on a new windows box
that was only put on the network yesterday. With
psexec I can do that by simply specifying the
domain/username to connect as and supply the password
when prompted. There are some interesting application
possibilities here.
I suppose you could think about it this way: SMBFS,
smbmount, and smbclient all allow you to access files
in shares on windows systems without requiring
anything be installed on the windows machines before
hand. A psexec port for UNIX would allow you to do
this for more than just files - you can run programs
and get remote shells as well.
Paul Jansen wrote:
[Deleted ...]
How is this different from rsh/rexec, or, for more
security, ssh?
--
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe at ns.aus.com, LPIC-1
www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself
Samba
in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba
http://briefcase.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Briefcase
- Manage your files online.
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list