DavidB at mail.interclean.com
Wed Nov 7 06:41:03 GMT 2001
Will there be an incremental release for this bugfix? Maybe 2.2.2a? I'll
go with the CVS release if necessary, but I prefer not to run CVS builds on
my production system.
From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:AEsh at tricord.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 6:03 PM
To: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Cc: Reinart, John
Subject: RE: winbind memleak
I just downloaded HEAD, and tested i386 Linux winbind for memory leaks. They
The sooner this gets into SAMBA_2_2, the better.
From: jra at samba.org [ mailto:jra at samba.org <mailto:jra at samba.org> ]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Janne Liimatainen
Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: winbind memleak
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:23:57PM +0200, Janne Liimatainen wrote:
> Hi all,
> any news about the memleak in winbind? Winbind process eats pretty quickly
> 400 megs of memory and starts lagging the machine. Which is not nice. :)
> Any patches? I'm willing to do testing.
Currently this is fixed in HEAD (right Tim ?). I'm planning on
moving it back to 2.2.3 but it's not done yet.
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the samba-technical