winbind memleak

David Brodbeck DavidB at
Wed Nov 7 06:41:03 GMT 2001

Will there be an incremental release for this bugfix?  Maybe 2.2.2a?  I'll
go with the CVS release if necessary, but I prefer not to run CVS builds on
my production system.

-----Original Message-----
From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:AEsh at]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 6:03 PM
To: samba-technical at
Cc: Reinart, John
Subject: RE: winbind memleak

I just downloaded HEAD, and tested i386 Linux winbind for memory leaks. They
are gone. 

The sooner this gets into SAMBA_2_2, the better. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: jra at [ mailto:jra at <mailto:jra at> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:19 PM 
To: Janne Liimatainen 
Cc: samba-technical at 
Subject: Re: winbind memleak 

On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:23:57PM +0200, Janne Liimatainen wrote: 
> Hi all, 
> any news about the memleak in winbind? Winbind process eats pretty quickly

> 400 megs of memory and starts lagging the machine. Which is not nice. :) 
> Any patches? I'm willing to do testing. 

Currently this is fixed in HEAD (right Tim ?). I'm planning on 
moving it back to 2.2.3 but it's not done yet. 


-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

More information about the samba-technical mailing list