New Interoperability Hope

[John E. Malmberg]

And I saw nothing in there that controlled a price for the access to the
information.

-John
wb8tyw at qsl.network
Personal Opinion Only

On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, David Collier-Brown wrote:

> "Michael B. Allen" wrote:
> > 
> > Anyone speak legalese? Does this mean we could finally get the IDL proper
> > for talking to the domain, exchange server, ADSI, etc? If so, I think
> > we should find out who to contact and politely approch them about it.
> 
> 	It means that MS has agreed, on pain of being sued by
> 	the signatories, to do or not do the listed actions.
> 
> 	You may recollect this whole suit started because they
> 	had breached the terms of a previous consent decree...
> 
>  	I do expect **considerable** material to be made available,
> 	but not because they're compelled to do so, but instead
> 	as a matter of good business practice.