more work to be done....

[Michael Gerdts]

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:00:56PM -0700, Christopher Travers wrote:
> I agree that assigning priorities is a pointless task in this development 
> model (anyone who finds it a high priority can be responsible for submitting 
> a patch).  Again, the coding for this would likely be trivial, but it may 
> prove useful, if that is what people would like to see.

How 'bout a "me too!" link that just increments a counter.  The intention
of this seems to be to reduce the list traffic.  If the list traffic is
reduced, one metric of how often a bug is encountered may be lost.  If not
too technically challenging, ballot stuffing logic should be built in.

Mike