more work to be done....
Michael.Gerdts at usa.alcatel.com
Thu May 17 20:28:28 GMT 2001
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 01:00:56PM -0700, Christopher Travers wrote:
> I agree that assigning priorities is a pointless task in this development
> model (anyone who finds it a high priority can be responsible for submitting
> a patch). Again, the coding for this would likely be trivial, but it may
> prove useful, if that is what people would like to see.
How 'bout a "me too!" link that just increments a counter. The intention
of this seems to be to reduce the list traffic. If the list traffic is
reduced, one metric of how often a bug is encountered may be lost. If not
too technically challenging, ballot stuffing logic should be built in.
More information about the samba-technical